The Third Crusade
Economy
Wars cost money, but that money could be made back. Did England make enough money to cover the cost of war?
In the 12th century, wealth was decided by how much land you owned. More land meant more crops and cattle to eat, more people to tax, and more influence and respect when it came to political affairs.
Before the Crusade started, England had a solid grip on the territory of the Holy Land, partially owning the cities of Tyre and Acre, as well as many surrounding settlements. However, in the compromise between Richard I and Saladin, it was stated that all English troops must withdraw from the Holy Land.Thus, England no longer controlled these areas and lost much of its wealth.
However, if they had not gone to the Crusade, Tyre and Acre would have been overcome by the armies of Saladin, with potentially even more territory taken from them.
Therefore, at first glance the Third Crusade may not have been worth it, but England took a risk in order to save its wealth, so it was worth it to take the risk and join the Crusade.
Before the Crusade started, England had a solid grip on the territory of the Holy Land, partially owning the cities of Tyre and Acre, as well as many surrounding settlements. However, in the compromise between Richard I and Saladin, it was stated that all English troops must withdraw from the Holy Land.Thus, England no longer controlled these areas and lost much of its wealth.
However, if they had not gone to the Crusade, Tyre and Acre would have been overcome by the armies of Saladin, with potentially even more territory taken from them.
Therefore, at first glance the Third Crusade may not have been worth it, but England took a risk in order to save its wealth, so it was worth it to take the risk and join the Crusade.